Fogging and Fumigation in Pharmaceutical Cleanrooms: Purpose, Procedure, and Validation Guidelines

By -

Introduction

Maintaining a sterile and contamination-free environment is one of the most critical requirements in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and healthcare industries. Fogging and fumigation are essential disinfection processes used to eliminate microbial contaminants such as bacteria, fungi, and spores from controlled areas, cleanrooms, and manufacturing facilities. These methods ensure that environmental hygiene standards meet regulatory requirements as per WHO, GMP, ISO 14644, and Schedule M guidelines.

What is Fogging and Fumigation?

Fogging and fumigation are disinfection techniques that use chemical agents in vaporized or aerosol form to achieve microbial decontamination of air and surfaces within enclosed spaces.

  • Fogging: A process that disperses a fine mist (aerosol) of disinfectant solution using a fogger machine. The droplets are small enough (5–10 µm) to remain suspended in the air and settle on all exposed surfaces, ensuring complete coverage.
  • Fumigation: The use of gaseous or vapor-phase chemical agents (e.g., formaldehyde, hydrogen peroxide vapor) to disinfect or sterilize enclosed spaces. Fumigation is typically performed in critical manufacturing or aseptic areas where a high level of microbial control is required.

Purpose of Fogging and Fumigation

The primary purpose of fogging and fumigation is to control microbial contamination and maintain sterility in production environments. The main objectives include:

  • Reducing airborne and surface microbial load.
  • Preventing cross-contamination between batches.
  • Maintaining controlled environmental conditions in cleanrooms.
  • Ensuring regulatory compliance with GMP, ISO 14698, and WHO guidelines.
  • Providing effective terminal disinfection after cleaning or maintenance activities.

Chemicals Commonly Used

The selection of disinfectant depends on the type of contamination, surface compatibility, and area classification. Commonly used disinfectants include:

DisinfectantConcentrationPurpose/Remarks
Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2)6–35%Broad-spectrum sporicidal disinfectant used for fogging and vapor disinfection.
Formaldehyde0.5–2% (with KMnO4)Highly effective but toxic; now mostly replaced due to safety and regulatory issues.
Peracetic Acid0.2–1%Effective against spores, bacteria, and viruses; leaves no harmful residues.
Isopropyl Alcohol (IPA)70%Surface sanitization after fumigation/fogging to remove residues.
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds (QACs)VariesUsed for general disinfection; effective against bacteria and fungi.

Fogging Procedure (Step-by-Step)

  1. Preparation: Clean the area thoroughly to remove visible dirt and dust. Ensure that the HVAC system is operational.
  2. Area Sealing: Close all doors, windows, and air vents to prevent leakage of fog.
  3. Fogging Solution Preparation: Prepare the disinfectant solution as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
  4. Fogger Setup: Position the fogger at a central location or multiple foggers for large areas.
  5. Fogging Operation: Operate the fogger until the required volume of disinfectant is dispersed (generally 3–6 ml/m³ for 6% H₂O₂).
  6. Contact Time: Allow sufficient contact time (typically 30–60 minutes) for the disinfectant to act effectively.
  7. Ventilation: After the required contact time, open the area and run the HVAC system for air clearance.
  8. Post-Fogging Monitoring: Perform environmental monitoring to confirm microbial reduction.

Fumigation Procedure (Formaldehyde Method - Traditional)

💬 About the Author

Siva Sankar is a Pharmaceutical Microbiology Consultant and Auditor with extensive experience in sterility testing, validation, and GMP compliance. He provides consultancy, training, and documentation services for pharmaceutical microbiology and cleanroom practices.

📧 Contact: siva17092@gmail.com
Mobile: 09505626106

📱 Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes and does not replace your laboratory’s SOPs or regulatory guidance. Always follow validated methods and manufacturer instructions.
  1. Preparation: Ensure area cleaning is completed.
  2. Chemical Reaction: Add 40 ml of formaldehyde solution (37–40%) with 10 g of potassium permanganate per m³ area.
  3. Reaction Setup: Place the mixture in heat-resistant bowls distributed evenly across the area.
  4. Sealing: Close all openings immediately after the reaction starts (vigorous gas release).
  5. Exposure Time: Keep the area closed for at least 12 hours.
  6. Neutralization: Use 10% ammonia solution or 25% sodium bisulfite to neutralize formaldehyde vapors.

Safety Precautions

  • Operators must wear PPE — gloves, masks, goggles, and protective suits.
  • Ensure the area is free of personnel during fumigation.
  • Use only validated disinfectants approved by QA and safety teams.
  • Ensure proper neutralization and ventilation post-operation.

Validation and Documentation

Fogging and fumigation processes must be validated to ensure consistent microbial reduction and regulatory compliance. Validation involves the following:

  • Microbiological Efficacy Test: Exposure of biological indicators (e.g., Bacillus atrophaeus or Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores).
  • Surface and Air Monitoring: CFU count reduction compared to baseline data.
  • Contact Time Verification: Confirmation that disinfectant exposure duration meets the validated requirement.
  • Record Keeping: Maintain logs for disinfectant preparation, fogging/fumigation details, and validation reports.

Acceptance Criteria

  • ≥ 3 log reduction in bacterial count for general areas.
  • ≥ 6 log reduction for aseptic or critical manufacturing areas.
  • No growth of pathogenic or objectionable microorganisms post-fogging/fumigation.

Frequency

The frequency of fogging or fumigation depends on the criticality of the area and environmental monitoring results:

  • Critical areas: Weekly or after any maintenance.
  • Non-critical areas: Monthly or as required.
  • Emergency fumigation: In case of contamination or microbial failure.

Regulatory References

  • WHO Technical Report Series (TRS) 961 – Annex 6
  • EU GMP Annex 1 – Manufacture of Sterile Medicinal Products
  • US FDA 21 CFR Part 211
  • ISO 14644 & ISO 14698 – Cleanroom Standards

Conclusion

Fogging and fumigation play a vital role in maintaining sterility assurance in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Regular disinfection, proper validation, and documentation ensure the highest levels of microbial control and compliance with international GMP standards. With advancements in automated fogging systems and safer disinfectants like hydrogen peroxide vapor, modern facilities can achieve superior contamination control while minimizing safety risks.

💬 About the Author

Siva Sankar is a Pharmaceutical Microbiology Consultant and Auditor with extensive experience in sterility testing, validation, and GMP compliance. He provides consultancy, training, and documentation services for pharmaceutical microbiology and cleanroom practices.

📧 Contact: siva17092@gmail.com
Mobile: 09505626106

📱 Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes and does not replace your laboratory’s SOPs or regulatory guidance. Always follow validated methods and manufacturer instructions.

Popular posts from this blog

Non-Viable particle count (NVPC)

By -
Image
Particle mater in room air limits are in particles of 0.5 μm and larger per cubic meter. ISO = cubic meter (m 3 ) FD Standard 209 E = cubic feet (ft 3 )   ISO class equal to federal standard 209 E class .  1m 3  = 35.31 ft 3 1m = 100 cm Adapted from former Federal Standard No. 209 E,                ISO = international organization for standard 14644 part -1, may -1999 p ublished. Maximum concentration limits (particles M3 of air) for particles equal to and larger than the considered sizes shown below: (a) ISO Classification Number(N) 0.1µm 0.2µm 0.3µm 0.5µm 1.0µm 5.0µm ISO 1 b                    10 d                 2 d d d e ISO 2 10...
Read more

Alert and Action Limits

By -
In pharmaceuticals alert and action limits are very important, because these limits are effective control to the process. alert and action limits are in house limits, these limits must be less than guideline limits or define limits. Alert and action limits defined based on trend analysis. alert and action limits are like a barrier before the guideline limits. Alert Limit: To be alert the microbial counts reach to this alert level. It is nor necessary to take any action. Possible deviation from normal process condition This is a trigger, that something is going wrong means microbial count increasing that area. Action Limits: When microbial count reach this action limits then action is mandatory. To control the  microbial count in the area. Signal an apparent deviation from normal process condition And require immediate action. If not controlled, we might get area failure. These alert and action limits must be less than final limits. Example : A...
Read more

TNTC vs TFTC

By -
Image
Too Numerous To Count (TNTC) or Too Many To Counts (TMTC) In samples with very high bacterial concentration, that is not suitable for counting (unable to get accurate counts) and reports the results as "to numerous to count" (TNTC). While the best solution is to collect another sample and dilute to get a more accurate counts, this might not always to be possible. Ideally one plate with 200 to 250 colonies are used. Counts above 250 are considered "to numerous to count" (TNTC), because it is impossible to count the colonies. plates countable range 25 to 250. Too Few To Count (TFTC): If there are less than 30 colonies on the plate, small errors in dilution technique or the presence of a few contaminants will have a drastic effect on the final count this count is called too few to count (TFTC).
Read more