How to Prove 6% Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂) Suitable for Fogging Activity: Complete Validation and Efficacy Study

By -
How to Prove 6% Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂) Suitable for Fogging Activity: Complete Validation and Efficacy Study

In pharmaceutical and biotechnology cleanrooms, environmental disinfection plays a vital role in maintaining aseptic conditions. Among various disinfectants, 6% Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂) is widely used for fogging applications due to its broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, residue-free nature, and compatibility with most cleanroom surfaces.

What is Fogging and Why is It Important?

Fogging is a disinfection process that involves converting a liquid disinfectant into a fine mist or aerosol form, allowing it to reach all surfaces, including hard-to-access areas like ceilings, HVAC ducts, and equipment undersides. This process ensures a uniform distribution of disinfectant throughout the controlled area, reducing microbial contamination.

Why 6% Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂) Is Used for Fogging

Hydrogen Peroxide acts as a strong oxidizing agent that destroys bacterial cell walls, viral envelopes, and fungal spores. The 6% concentration is considered optimal because it provides:

  • Excellent broad-spectrum antimicrobial efficacy
  • Low residue and non-toxic breakdown into water and oxygen
  • Material compatibility with stainless steel, PVC, glass, and other cleanroom materials
  • Stability for routine fogging operations

Steps to Prove the Suitability of 6% Hydrogen Peroxide for Fogging Activity

1. Preparation and Setup

Before starting the validation study, ensure that:

  • The cleanroom area is closed and air handling units (AHUs) are turned off.
  • All materials and equipment are covered or removed as per the SOP.
  • Temperature and humidity are recorded.
  • The fogging machine is calibrated and operationally qualified (OQ completed).

2. Disinfectant Preparation

Use pharmaceutical-grade 6% Hydrogen Peroxide solution prepared with purified or WFI-grade water. Label the solution with:

  • Preparation date and time
  • Concentration verification (using titration or peroxide test strips)
  • Expiry date as per manufacturer’s recommendation

3. Fogging Procedure

Operate the fogger as per standard operating procedures (SOP). The typical cycle involves:

  • Using approximately 5–10 mL of 6% H₂O₂ per cubic meter of room volume
  • Running the fogger for 30–45 minutes depending on area size
  • Contact or exposure time of at least 45–60 minutes
  • Allowing adequate aeration before personnel re-entry

4. Microbiological Validation Study

To prove efficacy, conduct a microbial kill study using:

  • Biological Indicators (BIs): Use Bacillus atrophaeus or Geobacillus stearothermophilus spore strips placed at critical locations (walls, ceilings, equipment, corners).
  • Surface Swab or Contact Plate Method: Place microbial plates before fogging and recover after the exposure period.
  • Air Sampling: Use active air samplers pre- and post-fogging to compare microbial counts.

The acceptance criteria should demonstrate at least a 3-log reduction (99.9%) in microbial load or complete kill of biological indicators depending on the area classification (Grade A/B/C/D).

5. Documentation and Reporting

After the study, prepare a Fogging Validation Report that includes:

  • Test objectives and methodology
  • Area details and fogging parameters
  • Microbiological results (pre- and post-fogging)
  • Graphical summary of microbial reduction
  • Photographic documentation of BI placement
  • Conclusion on disinfectant suitability

Acceptance Criteria

To confirm 6% Hydrogen Peroxide suitability for fogging, the following parameters must be achieved:

  • ≥ 3-log reduction in microbial counts
  • Complete inactivation of all biological indicators
  • No visible residue or corrosion on surfaces
  • Odor-free and non-toxic residual atmosphere
  • Compliance with GMP and ISO 14698 standards

Advantages of 6% H₂O₂ Fogging

  • Highly effective against bacteria, fungi, spores, and viruses
  • No harmful residues after breakdown (H₂O + O₂)
  • Easy to validate and repeatable process
  • Safe for routine disinfection of sterile areas

Conclusion

Validation of 6% Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂) for fogging activity ensures a reliable and scientifically proven method for cleanroom disinfection. Following the proper validation protocol—covering preparation, execution, and microbial efficacy testing—helps demonstrate compliance with GMP, WHO, and EU guidelines. Hence, 6% Hydrogen Peroxide is a proven and effective choice for pharmaceutical fogging applications.

💬 About the Author

Siva Sankar is a Pharmaceutical Microbiology Consultant and Auditor with extensive experience in sterility testing, validation, and GMP compliance. He provides consultancy, training, and documentation services for pharmaceutical microbiology and cleanroom practices.

📧 Contact: siva17092@gmail.com
Mobile: 09505626106

📱 Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes and does not replace your laboratory’s SOPs or regulatory guidance. Always follow validated methods and manufacturer instructions.

Popular posts from this blog

TNTC vs TFTC

By -
Image
Too Numerous To Count (TNTC) or Too Many To Counts (TMTC) In samples with very high bacterial concentration, that is not suitable for counting (unable to get accurate counts) and reports the results as "to numerous to count" (TNTC). While the best solution is to collect another sample and dilute to get a more accurate counts, this might not always to be possible. Ideally one plate with 200 to 250 colonies are used. Counts above 250 are considered "to numerous to count" (TNTC), because it is impossible to count the colonies. plates countable range 25 to 250. Too Few To Count (TFTC): If there are less than 30 colonies on the plate, small errors in dilution technique or the presence of a few contaminants will have a drastic effect on the final count this count is called too few to count (TFTC).
Read more

Non-Viable particle count (NVPC)

By -
Image
Particle mater in room air limits are in particles of 0.5 μm and larger per cubic meter. ISO = cubic meter (m 3 ) FD Standard 209 E = cubic feet (ft 3 )   ISO class equal to federal standard 209 E class .  1m 3  = 35.31 ft 3 1m = 100 cm Adapted from former Federal Standard No. 209 E,                ISO = international organization for standard 14644 part -1, may -1999 p ublished. Maximum concentration limits (particles M3 of air) for particles equal to and larger than the considered sizes shown below: (a) ISO Classification Number(N) 0.1µm 0.2µm 0.3µm 0.5µm 1.0µm 5.0µm ISO 1 b                    10 d                 2 d d d e ISO 2 10...
Read more

Alert and Action Limits

By -
In pharmaceuticals alert and action limits are very important, because these limits are effective control to the process. alert and action limits are in house limits, these limits must be less than guideline limits or define limits. Alert and action limits defined based on trend analysis. alert and action limits are like a barrier before the guideline limits. Alert Limit: To be alert the microbial counts reach to this alert level. It is nor necessary to take any action. Possible deviation from normal process condition This is a trigger, that something is going wrong means microbial count increasing that area. Action Limits: When microbial count reach this action limits then action is mandatory. To control the  microbial count in the area. Signal an apparent deviation from normal process condition And require immediate action. If not controlled, we might get area failure. These alert and action limits must be less than final limits. Example : A...
Read more