Fumigation vs Fogging in Pharmaceutical Microbiology: Key Differences and Best Practices
Author: Siva Sankar, Pharmaceutical Microbiology Consultant
Category: Cleanroom Sanitization / Microbiology Practices
Updated: October 2025
🔍 Introduction
Maintaining microbial control in pharmaceutical cleanrooms and microbiology labs is critical to ensure product sterility and regulatory compliance. Two common disinfection methods used are fumigation and fogging. Although these terms are often used interchangeably, they differ in chemical, process, and regulatory acceptance.
🧫 What is Fumigation?
Fumigation involves vaporizing a disinfectant chemical, typically formaldehyde gas, to sterilize a closed environment. The gas penetrates surfaces and equipment, killing microorganisms including bacterial spores.
- Chemical Used: Formaldehyde + Potassium permanganate (KMnO₄)
- Advantages: High-level disinfection, effective against spores
- Disadvantages: Carcinogenic, corrosive, leaves residues, banned by WHO and GMP for pharmaceutical use
- Regulatory Status: Discontinued as per WHO TRS 961 (Annex 6)
🌫️ What is Fogging?
Fogging uses a fine mist (aerosol) of a liquid disinfectant—commonly Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂) or Peracetic Acid (PAA)—dispersed into the air using a fogger machine. It ensures uniform distribution and rapid surface contact without leaving harmful residues.
- Chemical Used: 6–12% Hydrogen Peroxide, or Peracetic Acid solutions
- Advantages: Non-toxic residue, safe for equipment, GMP-accepted
- Disadvantages: Requires good air circulation and validated contact time
- Regulatory Status: Recommended by EU GMP Annex 1 and ISO 14644
⚗️ Comparative Summary
| Parameter | Fumigation | Fogging |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Used | Formaldehyde + KMnO₄ | Hydrogen Peroxide or Peracetic Acid |
| Residue | Toxic, carcinogenic | Water and oxygen only |
| Time Required | Overnight (8–12 hrs) | 2–4 hrs |
| GMP Approval | Not accepted | Approved |
| Effectiveness | High | High and safer |
| Safety | Requires PPE and neutralization | Safe with ventilation |
🏭 Best Practice Recommendation
Modern pharmaceutical facilities should replace formaldehyde fumigation with Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂) fogging or Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP) systems. These methods comply with GMP, are environment-friendly, and reduce operator exposure risks.
📋 Fogging Procedure Overview
- Seal the cleanroom and switch off AHU.
- Prepare the required quantity of disinfectant (e.g., 6% H₂O₂).
- Use an ULV fogger; position it at a central location.
- Start fogging and ensure fine mist distribution.
- Allow minimum 2–4 hrs contact time.
- Switch on AHU and ventilate area before entry.
📚 References
- WHO TRS 961, Annex 6 — GMP for Sterile Pharmaceutical Products
- EU GMP Annex 1 (2023) — Manufacture of Sterile Medicinal Products
- ISO 14644 — Cleanroom Standards
👨🔬 About the Author
Siva Sankar is a Pharmaceutical Microbiology Consultant with extensive experience in GMP audits, cleanroom validation, and aseptic process assurance. He provides training, audit consultancy, and technical guidance for pharma industries seeking compliance excellence.
Contact: siva17092@gmail.com | +91 9505626106
Follow this blog for more pharma microbiology insights and practical guidance.

Comments
Post a Comment