Is Sterilization of Green Crepe Wrapping Paper Mandatory in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing?

Is Sterilization of Green Crepe Wrapping Paper Mandatory in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing?

This article explains whether sterilization of green crepe wrapping paper is mandatory in pharmaceutical manufacturing, based on scientific rationale, GMP principles, regulatory expectations, and real audit observations.

Table of Contents


Introduction

Green crepe wrapping paper is widely used in pharmaceutical manufacturing to wrap tools, accessories, components, and materials before sterilization or transfer into clean areas.

A common question raised during audits, investigations, and routine GMP discussions is: “Is sterilization of green crepe wrapping paper mandatory, or is it only a recommended practice?”

This article answers that question using a problem-based, scientific, and regulatory approach rather than theoretical definitions.


This infographic illustrates why sterilization of green crepe wrapping paper is essential in pharmaceutical manufacturing. It highlights contamination risks associated with non-sterilized paper, compares sterilized versus non-sterilized usage, shows common sterilization methods such as steam and dry heat, and explains regulatory expectations under GMP, USP, and EU-GMP. The image also reflects typical audit observations related to improper handling or lack of sterilization records for wrapping materials.

Scientific Principle Behind Sterilizing Wrapping Materials

The fundamental principle is simple:

  • Any material entering a controlled or aseptic area becomes a potential source of contamination
  • Wrapping materials directly contact sterile tools or product contact surfaces
  • Microorganisms can survive on paper fibers and transfer during handling

Green crepe paper is a porous cellulose-based material. Porosity allows:

  • Microbial retention
  • Airborne contamination entrapment
  • Moisture absorption, promoting microbial survival

Therefore, from a microbiological risk perspective, non-sterilized crepe paper contradicts contamination control principles.

Procedure Overview for Sterilizing Green Crepe Wrapping Paper

Typical pharmaceutical facilities follow the below procedure:

Step-wise Overview

  1. Visual inspection of crepe paper (no tears, dust, fibers)
  2. Wrapping of cleaned tools or components
  3. Placement in stainless steel baskets or trays
  4. Sterilization using validated method (Steam or Dry Heat)
  5. Post-sterilization integrity check
  6. Controlled transfer to clean/aseptic areas

Common Sterilization Methods

Method Typical Cycle Suitability
Steam Sterilization 121°C / 15–30 min Most commonly used
Dry Heat 160–170°C / 2 hrs Limited use (paper integrity risk)

Sterilized vs Non-Sterilized Green Crepe Paper

Parameter Sterilized Crepe Paper Non-Sterilized Crepe Paper
Microbial Risk Minimal High
Audit Acceptance Compliant Frequently questioned
Contamination Probability Very Low Moderate to High
Use in Aseptic Areas Acceptable Not recommended

Scientific Rationale and Justification

The real issue is not whether a regulation explicitly says “sterilize green crepe paper”, but whether its use introduces a contamination risk.

Key scientific concerns include:

  • Paper fibers shedding into sterile zones
  • Microbial transfer during unwrapping
  • Condensation-assisted microbial survival
  • False sterility assurance of wrapped tools

In aseptic processing, risk-based thinking overrides literal wording of guidelines.


Regulatory Expectations (USP, PDA, EU-GMP)

Pharmaceutical regulations may not explicitly mention the term “green crepe wrapping paper”. However, regulatory expectations are based on contamination risk and sterility assurance, not on naming individual materials.

From a GMP and microbiological perspective, any material that directly or indirectly contacts sterile tools, components, or aseptic environments must not introduce contamination. Green crepe wrapping paper, being porous and fibrous, is therefore considered a critical cleanroom consumable.

  • United States Pharmacopeia (USP) emphasizes contamination control, aseptic technique, and prevention of microbial transfer. Materials entering controlled or aseptic areas must be suitably cleaned, disinfected, or sterilized based on risk.
  • Parenteral Drug Association (PDA) technical guidance highlights that items introduced into critical areas should be sterile whenever feasible. Wrapping materials used to protect sterile tools are considered part of the sterility assurance system.
  • EU-GMP Annex 1 clearly states that all items entering Grade A and Grade B areas must be sterile or effectively decontaminated. This requirement applies not only to equipment and tools, but also to the materials used to wrap or protect them.

Because green crepe wrapping paper is used as a protective barrier for sterile items, auditors expect it to be sterilized or supported by a documented risk assessment. The use of non-sterilized wrapping paper without scientific justification is commonly considered a gap in the contamination control strategy.


Practical Scenarios from Pharmaceutical Facilities

Scenario 1: Sterile Tool Wrapped with Non-Sterile Paper

Even if the tool is sterile, the outer surface of the paper is not. During unwrapping, microbes may transfer to gloves or tool surfaces.

Scenario 2: Reuse of Crepe Paper

Reusing crepe paper without sterilization is considered a critical GMP failure.

Scenario 3: Material Transfer into Grade B Area

Non-sterilized paper entering Grade B areas often triggers audit observations.


Failure Risks and Probability in Real Labs

Failure Mode Probability Impact
Microbial Transfer Medium High
Audit Observation High Medium
Batch Contamination Low to Medium Critical

Common Audit Observations

  • No sterilization record for wrapping materials
  • Justification missing for non-sterile crepe use
  • Inadequate SOP for wrapping process
  • No risk assessment for material entry

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Is sterilization legally mandatory?

Not explicitly named, but required based on contamination risk.

2. Can disinfectant spraying replace sterilization?

No. Spraying does not ensure sterility.

3. Is crepe paper considered a critical consumable?

Yes, in aseptic and cleanroom environments.

4. Can non-sterile paper be used in Grade D areas?

Sometimes allowed with documented risk assessment.

5. What is the best practice?

Sterilize or procure pre-sterilized wrapping materials.

6. Does Annex 1 mention crepe paper?

No, but it mandates sterile material entry.


Summary

Sterilization of green crepe wrapping paper is not just a procedural step—it is a risk mitigation strategy essential for GMP compliance.


Conclusion

Sterilization of green crepe wrapping paper is effectively mandatory in pharmaceutical manufacturing wherever sterility assurance is expected.

Facilities that ignore this risk often face audit observations, contamination events, and compliance challenges.

A proactive, risk-based approach ensures both product safety and regulatory confidence.


💬 About the Author

Siva Sankar is a Pharmaceutical Microbiology Consultant and Auditor with 17+ years of industry experience and extensive hands-on expertise in sterility testing, environmental monitoring, microbiological method validation, bacterial endotoxin testing, water systems, and GMP compliance. He provides professional consultancy, technical training, and regulatory documentation support for pharmaceutical microbiology laboratories and cleanroom operations.

He has supported regulatory inspections, audit preparedness, and GMP compliance programs across pharmaceutical manufacturing and quality control laboratories.

📧 Email: pharmaceuticalmicrobiologi@gmail.com


📘 Regulatory Review & References

This article has been technically reviewed and periodically updated with reference to current regulatory and compendial guidelines, including the Indian Pharmacopoeia (IP), USP General Chapters, WHO GMP, EU GMP, ISO standards, PDA Technical Reports, PIC/S guidelines, MHRA, and TGA regulatory expectations.

Content responsibility and periodic technical review are maintained by the author in line with evolving global regulatory expectations.


⚠️ Disclaimer

This article is intended strictly for educational and knowledge-sharing purposes. It does not replace or override your organization’s approved Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), validation protocols, or regulatory guidance. Always follow site-specific validated methods, manufacturer instructions, and applicable regulatory requirements. Any illustrative diagrams or schematics are used solely for educational understanding. “This article is intended for informational and educational purposes for professionals and students interested in pharmaceutical microbiology.”

Updated to align with current USP, EU GMP, and PIC/S regulatory expectations. “This guide is useful for students, early-career microbiologists, quality professionals, and anyone learning how microbiology monitoring works in real pharmaceutical environments.”


Last Updated:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Too Numerous To Count (TNTC) & Too Few To Count (TFTC) in Microbiology: Meaning, Limits, Calculations, and GMP Impact

Non-Viable Particle Count (NVPC) in Cleanrooms: Principles, Methods & GMP Requirements

Alert and Action Limits in Environmental Monitoring: GMP Meaning, Differences & Best Practices